A few years later, I was spinning a drug-store rack and came
upon a book called “The Lord of the Rings.” I was intrigued because we’d just
read “The Lord of the Flies” in English class, so I thought I’d give this new
book a try. I loved it. The next week the cover of Time blared, “Lord of the
Rings Sweeps Nation!” Who knew that a reporter was looking over my shoulder at
the Rexall?
Time marched on. I discovered a small restaurant called "McDonalds" and gave it my business; I abandoned my eight-track tape player. Years later, I thought my feet looked stupid (there’s that
word again) in Earth Shoes. So good-by Earth Shoes – for me, and for all of the
fashion world.
I began to think that I was a trend-setter, or, perhaps, the
fabled “Everyman.” And it’s happening again. After giving the Facebook the old
college try for a year or so, I find my enthusiasm for the medium waning (oh,
certainly not for your posts, dear Friend). So my usage is slipping into
infrequency. Sure enough, as soon as I realized this was happening I saw this
headline in Salon.com: “Is
Facebook’s Growth Slowing?” Sorry, Facebook. And look out, Twitter; I’m
about to give you a try. What will Everyman’s verdict be?
(Of course there’s always the exception that proves the
rule. Back in those flat-top days I was attracted for a time to a new
sensation, “The Beatles,” but quickly rejected them and turned back to my
beloved Kingston Trio. The Fab Four somehow managed to survive.)
3 comments:
Hey, where's the picture of you as Rip Van Winkle sporting the " collegiate"?
That's not to be missed!
The line that collapsed me into giggles was, "I began to think that I was a trend-setter."
Actually, I was no trend-setter myself. I do remember the hair goop. It was generally called Butch Wax, and the brand I used was Rose's El Butcho Wax. I put it on so thick some days that my head was like a candle with ten thousand skinny wicks.
Post a Comment